office memorandum

Office Memorandum — 13 August 1990

Primary source: Department of Personnel & Training; NCBC reproduction

60-SECOND SUMMARY

What is this record?

DoPT O.M. No. 36012/31/90-Estt.(SCT) provided for 27% reservation of vacancies in Union civil posts and services for socially and educationally backward classes in direct recruitment. Its effective-date language referred to 7 August 1990, with a qualification for recruitment already initiated.

  • O.M. No. 36012/31/90-Estt.(SCT)
  • 27% in direct recruitment to Union civil posts and services
  • Open-merit candidates not counted against the quota
Parliament House in New Delhi in 1926
Parliament House, New Delhi, in 1926. Institutional context; this image does not depict the later record event. National Archives of India via Wikimedia Commons · CC0 / public domain

RECORD PREVIEW

The source at a glance

Department of Personnel & Training; NCBC reproductionDoPT O.M. No. 36012/31/90-Estt.(SCT)official office memorandum reproduction · 13 August 1990

Official source linked; no source document is reproduced.

THE DOCUMENT

What This Record Actually Says

  • It concerned 27% of vacancies in civil posts and services under the Government of India in direct recruitment.
  • SEBC/OBC candidates selected on open merit on the same standards were not counted against the 27% reservation.
  • Its effective-date wording referred to 7 August 1990, subject to the source’s qualification for recruitment already initiated.

CONTEXT

Why It Matters

  • It was the government action that put a central part of the Mandal recommendation into an administrative framework and became the subject of litigation.

READ WITH CARE

What It Does NOT Say

  • It did not create EWS reservation.
  • It was not the Central educational-admissions quota.
  • It did not alter SC or ST reservation percentages.

SOURCE CONNECTIONS

Follow the Record

  1. recommendation later receives government action Mandal Commission Report
  2. policy is challenged in the case Indra Sawhney

Each connection is rendered from the archive’s typed canonical relationship data. A chronological connection does not by itself claim legal causation.

BEFORE

What Came Before

Mandal Commission Report

NEXT

What Happened Next

Indra Sawhney

CONNECTED EVIDENCE

Connected Records

INQUIRY

Questions Worth Asking

  • Which parts of the memorandum were challenged before the Supreme Court?

COMMON CONFUSIONS

Keep Separate

  • The memorandum concerns OBC/SEBC direct recruitment, not EWS or the later educational-admissions framework.

EDITORIAL LAYER

Editor's Reading Note

Editorial reading note in preparation.

Reading note in preparation

SOURCE & PROVENANCE

View the Original Record

DoPT O.M. No. 36012/31/90-Estt.(SCT)
Department of Personnel & Training; NCBC reproduction
official office memorandum reproduction

VIEW ORIGINAL RECORD ↗

Source problem or correction? Tell the editor.